2 Peter 2:3 “And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.”
|
Reply
👍
3
| 0
replies
E
@El_Cyd_🇺🇸
Mon 20 Dec
Link he gives comes up error 404
Did I get it wrong?
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12-pdf/12-398_1b7b.pdf
I don’t think after the first 12 there is a dash and it is 7d not b… from what I heard but even that doesn’t work…
|
Reply
0
Reactions
| 0
replies
J
@JulieCohick
Mon 20 Dec
If you listened through to the end the commentator said that he has tried to find this site & even this video & both are gone.
|
Reply
0
Reactions
| 0
replies
T
@Thepink1
Mon 20 Dec
I printed it out like a year ago. Let me go dig it out. I wonder if they deleted it
|
Reply
👍
1
| 0
replies
T
@TheDonB
Mon 20 Dec
They want to eliminate the only control group, we the un-vaxxed, because as long as we exist it destroys their narrative.
|
Reply
👍
3
| 0
replies
M
@monkey58
Mon 20 Dec
Go here...https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf . If you're having trouble getting there change browsers. Brave works fine for all CloutHub resources.
Just printed it out, but at first glance it seems to be talking about the BRCA gene - which has to do with breast cancers.
|
Reply
0
Reactions
| 0
replies
D
@DARROCH
Mon 20 Dec
I had to put the link in twice. first time came up error no supreme court doc. found... and I used duck duck go not alphabet inc......
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf
No . pdf at the end but the rest is correct Darroch
|
Reply
👍
1
| 0
replies
S
@staylorsurfdog
Mon 20 Dec
old news
|
Reply
😡
1
| 1
reply
I
@Ironheadz
Mon 20 Dec
Who cares if its Old, being old doesn't make it less important.
|
Reply
👍
4
| 2
replies
M
@Maximum110
Tue 21 Dec
Ignorance is the enemy. Thanks for posting
|
Reply
0
Reactions
E
@Emotive_TheMusic
Tue 21 Dec
I know, right? Don't ya just hate that?
|
Reply
0
Reactions
D
@DARROCH
Tue 21 Dec
Well, I read the whole decision.... I don't know what the guy in the video is reading.... none of what he read is written in the decision handed down by the court.... the decision is about isolating dna and just because you found it and isolated it,, ( because dna exists naturally in
|
Reply
0
Reactions
| 0
replies
D
@DARROCH
Tue 21 Dec
nature ) it cannot be patented.... But If you altered and modified Dna, or a portion of it and created a new non-naturally occurring Dna then that new altered dna can be patented. So does this mean if gates and faucci change human dna through jabs??? now we are patented company property????????????
|
Reply
👍
1
| 2
replies
Q
@QueenMo1111
Tue 21 Dec
That is exactly what that means.... you lose your God Given autonomy once you become a man made hybrid through DNA tampering
